Tuesday, May 22, 2012

Housing Opportunity Index: Pueblo most affordable city, Boulder least affordable

The National Association of Home Builders and Wells Fargo released the first-quarter Housing Affordable Index this month. According to the index, Pueblo was the most affordable city in the state for home buyers, while Boulder was the least affordable. In fact, Pueblo was one of the most affordable cities in the nation with a ranking of 27th out of 225 cities. Boulder, on the other hand was one of the least affordable cities in the nation with a ranking of 199th out of 225.

 The index calculates affordability based on the share of homes in the area affordable for households at the median income level.

Colorado Springs was ranked 65th while Ft. Collins-Loveland, Greeley, and Denver were ranked 118th, 127th and 150th, respectively. Grand Junction was not included on the list.

The index listed its calculations for the median sales price in each metro:

Boulder, $199,000
Colorado Springs, $180,000
Denver-Aurora, $150,000
Greeley, $175,000
Ft. Collins-Loveland, $214,000
Pueblo $110,000

Nationwide, the most affordable area was Cumberland, Marylandon the West Virginia border, and the least affordable area was San Francisco. 

The index calculates affordability of purchase homes and does not include information on rental housing.

According to the NAHB press release:




Nationwide Housing Affordability Reaches New Record High
Tight Credit Remains Primary Obstacle for Buyers

WASHINGTON, May 17 - Nationwide housing affordability hit a new record high for a second consecutive quarter in the first three months of this year, according to the National Association of Home Builders/Wells Fargo Housing Opportunity Index (HOI), released today. Yet tight lending conditions continue to pose a major obstacle to many prospective home buyers.

The latest HOI data reveal that 77.5 percent of all new and existing homes that were sold in this year's first quarter were affordable to families earning the national median income of $65,000.  This beats the previous record set in the final quarter of 2011, when 75.9 percent of homes sold were affordable to median-income earners.

"Homes in this year's first quarter were more affordable than they have been at any time in more than 20 years, yet many potential sales are not happening because of overly tight lending conditions that are keeping hardworking families from obtaining a suitable mortgage," said Barry Rutenberg, chairman of the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB) and a home builder from Gainesville, Fla. "Without this significant hurdle, the housing and economic recovery could be proceeding at a much stronger pace."

The most affordable major housing market in this year's first quarter was Indianapolis-Carmel, Ind., where 95.8 percent of homes sold during the period were affordable to households earning the area's median family income of $66,900.

Also ranking among the  most affordable major housing markets in respective order were Dayton, Ohio; Lakeland-Winter Haven, Fla.; Modesto, Calif.; Grand Rapids-Wyoming, Mich.; and Buffalo-Niagara Falls, N.Y.; the latter two of which tied for fifth place.

Among smaller housing markets, Cumberland, Md.-W.Va. topped the affordability chart for the first time in this year's first quarter. There, 99 percent of homes sold during the first quarter were affordable to families earning the area's median income of $53,000. Other smaller housing markets at the top of the index include Fairbanks, Alaska; Wheeling, W.Va.; Kokomo, Ind.; and Davenport-Moline-Rock Island, Iowa-Ill., respectively.

In New York-White Plains-Wayne, N.Y.-N.J., which retained the title of the least affordable major housing market for a 16th consecutive quarter, just 31.5 percent of homes sold in the first three months of this year were affordable to those earning the area's median income of $68,200.

Other major metros at the bottom of the affordability chart included San Francisco-San Mateo-Redwood City, Calif.; Honolulu; Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, Calif.; and Santa Ana-Anaheim-Irvine, Calif., respectively.

Ocean City, N.J., was the least affordable smaller housing market on the list, with 45.9 percent of homes sold in the first quarter affordable to families earning the median income of $71,100. Other small metros at the bottom of the list included Santa Cruz-Watsonville, Calif.; San Luis Obispo-Paso Robles, Calif.; Santa Barbara-Santa Maria-Goleta, Calif.; and Laredo, Texas.